Анализ сайта greenhousedefect.com
Основное Готовность: 75%
Домен
greenhousedefect.com
Состояние доменного имени
?
Проверяем корректность доменного имени и наличие технических проблем на уровне домена.
Длина домена велика. Но если вы продвигаете запрос, входящий в название домена, то это хорошо.
Домен второго уровня идеален для продвижения.
Ответ сервера
200 Успешный ответ
HTTP-код ответа и цепочка редиректов
?
Код 200 — страница доступна. Коды 3xx — редиректы (цепочки замедляют загрузку и размывают ссылочный вес). Коды 4xx/5xx — ошибки, поисковик не сможет проиндексировать страницу.
Сервер настроен корректно.
Цепочка редиректов:
http://greenhousedefect.com
301 MovedPermanently
https://greenhousedefect.com/
200 OK
Безопасность
Сайт безопасен
Использование HTTPS и SSL-сертификат
?
HTTPS — обязательный стандарт. Google и Яндекс отдают предпочтение защищённым сайтам. Отсутствие SSL или просроченный сертификат ведут к предупреждениям в браузере и снижению позиций.
Не настроен HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) — рекомендуется включить.
На сайте работает защищенный протокол ssl и сайт открывается по https.
Ssl-сертификат действителен до 23.10.2026 20:22:46.
HTTP автоматически перенаправляется на HTTPS.
Поздравляем! Сайт не содержится в реестре РКН.
Кодировка
utf-8
Кодировка символов страницы
?
Стандарт — UTF-8. Неправильная кодировка вызывает нечитаемые символы и мешает поисковику корректно распознать текст страницы.
Указана кодировка на странице utf-8.
Язык
en-US
Атрибут lang в HTML-теге
?
Атрибут lang (<html lang="ru">) сообщает поисковикам и браузерам, на каком языке написана страница. Помогает при ранжировании в региональном поиске.
Язык документа указан явно: en-US.
Скорость загрузки
~0,97сек
Время отклика сервера (TTFB)
?
Time To First Byte — время до получения первого байта от сервера. Норма до 200 мс. Медленный отклик ухудшает пользовательский опыт и ранжирование: Яндекс и Google учитывают скорость страниц.
Скорость загрузки сайта 0,97сек оптимальна.
Объем документа
40Кб
Размер HTML-кода страницы
?
Слишком большой HTML замедляет парсинг браузером и сканирование поисковым роботом. Рекомендуется не более 200 Кб.
Объем html-документа 40Кб оптимален.
Структура html-документа корректна.
Ресурсы
Ресурсы: 14
Внешние ресурсы страницы (CSS, JS, изображения)
?
Количество и тип подключённых ресурсов влияют на скорость загрузки. Большое число запросов увеличивает время рендеринга страницы.
Кол-во файлов ресурсов 14 много для одной страницы. Приемлемо до 10. Проведите оптимизацию файлов ресурсов!
Показать полный список ресурсов
| Тип | Название | Значение |
|---|---|---|
| stylesheet | text/css | /typo3conf/ext/news/Resources/Public/Css/news-basic.css?1619982806 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /typo3temp/assets/css/82a8d5a61d.css?1620024451 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/Css/flexslider.css?1619517776 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/Css/mods.css?1621097817 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /typo3conf/ext/mindshape_cookie_hint/Resources/Public/Css/dark-bottom.css?1620674564 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /fileadmin/template/start.css?1622302678 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /fileadmin/template/boilerplate.css?1622124491 |
| stylesheet | text/css | /fileadmin/template/bilder.css?1619514994 |
| js | text/javascript | https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js |
| js | text/javascript | /fileadmin/template/respond.min.js?1619514152 |
| js | https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-96WS4HJ9XQ | |
| js | text/javascript | https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js |
| js | text/javascript | /typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/JavaScript/jquery.flexslider-min.js?1619517776 |
| js | text/javascript | /typo3conf/ext/mindshape_cookie_hint/Resources/Public/Js/cookieconsent.js?1620674633 |
Серверные заголовки
Кол-во: 7
HTTP-заголовки ответа сервера
?
Заголовки сервера передают браузеру и поисковику служебную информацию: кеширование, безопасность (CSP, HSTS), сжатие (gzip). Правильная настройка ускоряет загрузку и повышает защищённость.
Найдены серверные заголовки 7шт. Подробнее про серверные заголовки.
Показать полный список серверных заголовков
| Ключ | Значение |
|---|---|
| Date | Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:38:44 GMT |
| Server | Apache |
| x-typo3-parsetime | 0ms |
| Cache-Control | max-age=0 |
| Vary | Accept-Encoding |
| X-UA-Compatible | IE=edge |
| X-Content-Type-Options | nosniff |
CMS
TYPO3
Система управления сайтом (движок)
?
CMS — это движок, на котором работает сайт (WordPress, 1C-Bitrix, Tilda и др.). Знание CMS помогает понять возможности SEO-оптимизации и подобрать подходящие инструменты. «Не определена» — вероятно, самописный сайт или нестандартная сборка.
Сайт работает на CMS TYPO3.
Веб-сервер
Apache
Программное обеспечение сервера
?
Веб-сервер — это ПО, которое отдаёт страницы посетителям (nginx, Apache, IIS, LiteSpeed и др.). Определяется по серверным заголовкам ответа (Server, X-Powered-By и т.п.). «Не определён» — сервер намеренно скрывает эти заголовки, это нормальная практика безопасности.
Сайт работает на веб-сервере Apache.
Мета-теги Готовность: 32%
Title
A critical approach to the actual science of climate change
Заголовок страницы в браузере и поисковой выдаче
?
Title — главный SEO-заголовок страницы. Влияет на CTR в поиске и ранжирование. Оптимальная длина: 50–70 символов. Ключевые слова — ближе к началу.
Необходимо уменьшить число символов в title (текущее значение: 59, оптимально: от 40 до 45)
Дублей словоформ в title не найдено.
Description
Описание страницы в поисковой выдаче (сниппет)
?
Meta Description — текст под заголовком в выдаче. Напрямую на позиции не влияет, но влияет на CTR. Оптимальная длина: 120–160 символов.
Установите мета-тег description!
Keywords
Список ключевых слов страницы (устаревший тег)
?
Meta Keywords не учитывается Яндексом и Google для ранжирования с 2009–2012 годов. Заполнение не обязательно, но не вредит. Конкурент может использовать содержимое для анализа.
Установите мета-тег keywords!
Канонический Url
https://greenhousedefect.com/
Указывает поисковику основную версию страницы
?
Canonical (rel=canonical) предотвращает проблему дублей страниц. Должен точно совпадать с URL проверяемой страницы. Неправильный canonical может передать ссылочный вес на другую страницу.
Канонический Url прописан корректно.
Robots
Ошибок нет
Директивы для поисковых роботов на уровне страницы
?
Meta Robots управляет индексацией конкретной страницы: index/noindex — индексировать ли, follow/nofollow — следовать ли по ссылкам. Noindex полностью исключает страницу из поиска.
Meta-тег robots не указан. Страница свободна для индексации.
Адаптивность
width=device-width, initial-scale=1
Настройка масштабирования на мобильных устройствах
?
Тег viewport (<meta name="viewport">) сообщает браузеру, как масштабировать страницу на мобильных. Стандарт: width=device-width, initial-scale=1. Отсутствие — признак отсутствия мобильной версии.
Meta-тег viewport со значением-константой width=device-width задаёт ширину страницы в соответствии с размером экрана.
Meta-тег viewport со значением initial-scale=1.0 определяет масштаб 1:1, т.е. «не масштабировать».
Разметка OpenGraph
Не найдено
Мета-теги для красивых превью в соцсетях
?
OpenGraph (og:title, og:description, og:image) управляет тем, как страница выглядит при репосте в социальных сетях и мессенджерах. Отсутствие OG-тегов — невзрачный превью при шеринге.
Разметка OpenGraph не задана. Страница не оптимизирована под социальные сети. Мета-теги с разметкой Og помогают социальным роботам лучше структурировать Ваш сайт.
Все мета-теги
Кол-во: 3
Полный список мета-тегов страницы
?
Таблица всех meta-тегов, включая нестандартные. Позволяет найти опечатки, дубли и лишние теги.
Найдены мета-теги 3шт. Мета-теги не видимы для человека и предназначены для обмена информацией между веб-страницей и поисковыми системами, браузерами и другими веб-службами. С ними роботы 🤖 и устройства ведут себя более ожидаемо.
Показать полный список мета-тегов
| Тип | Название | Значение |
|---|---|---|
| name | generator | TYPO3 CMS |
| name | twitter:card | summary |
| name | viewport | width=device-width, initial-scale=1 |
Оптимизация Готовность: 92%
Структура
Ошибок нет
Семантические HTML-элементы страницы
?
Проверяет наличие основных структурных элементов: nav, header, footer, main. Корректная семантическая структура помогает поисковику понять архитектуру страницы.
Структура документа корректна (теги <html> и <body> присутствуют по одному на документ).
Контент
Ошибок нет
Объём и качество текстового содержимого
?
Анализирует объём полезного текста на странице. Слишком мало — страница может считаться малополезной. Слишком много — ухудшается читаемость и восприятие.
Слова из title 9 встречаются в тексте достаточно.
Абзацев с текстом 89 достаточно.
Среднее число слов в абзаце 25 достаточно.
Кол-во знаков контента 12861 на странице оптимально.
Кол-во слов 2215 на странице оптимально.
Заголовки
Ошибок нет
Иерархия заголовков H1–H6
?
H1 должен быть один и содержать ключевой запрос. H2–H6 описывают подразделы. Пропуск уровней (H1 → H3) и несколько H1 — типичные ошибки, снижающие понятность страницы для поисковика.
На странице присутствуют заголовки <h1> 1. Это прекрасно.
На странице присутствуют заголовки <h2> 1. Это хорошо.
На странице присутствуют заголовки <h3> 21.
Тошнота
4,47
Насколько одно слово доминирует в тексте
?
Классическая тошнота = √(частота самого повторяющегося слова). Норма до 7–8: текст воспринимается естественно. Выше — поисковик может счесть страницу переспамленной.
Тошнота страницы в пределах нормы 4,47.
Академич. тошнота
22,89%
Насколько текст перенасыщен ключевыми словами
?
Академическая тошнота = (частота слова / общее количество слов) × 100%. Показывает долю конкретного слова в тексте. Норма 5–15%.
Академическая тошнота превышает норму 5-15%. Измените текст страницы!
Семантическое ядро
20
Наиболее часто встречающиеся слова на странице
?
Топ слов по частоте использования. Показывает, какие слова доминируют в тексте с точки зрения поисковика.
Контент страницы содержит осмысленный текст и слова.
Показать список слов
| Слово | Кол-во | Частота |
|---|---|---|
| climate | 20 | 0,90% |
| emissions | 7 | 0,32% |
| science | 6 | 0,27% |
| “climate | 6 | 0,27% |
| physics | 6 | 0,27% |
| little | 6 | 0,27% |
| really | 6 | 0,27% |
| consensus | 6 | 0,27% |
| aerosols | 6 | 0,27% |
| science” | 5 | 0,23% |
| feedbacks | 5 | 0,23% |
| sensitivity | 5 | 0,23% |
| feedback | 5 | 0,23% |
| models | 5 | 0,23% |
| rather | 5 | 0,23% |
| contrails | 4 | 0,18% |
| something | 4 | 0,18% |
| articles | 4 | 0,18% |
| actually | 4 | 0,18% |
| anyway | 4 | 0,18% |
Индексация Готовность: 75%
Индексирование
Ошибок нет
Разрешено ли индексирование страницы
?
Проверяет, не закрыта ли страница от индексации через robots.txt, meta robots или X-Robots-Tag. Страница, закрытая от индексации, не появится в поисковой выдаче.
Анкоров на странице 54 оптимально. Поисковые роботы обязательно проиндексируют сайт.
Robots.txt
Найден корректный robots.txt
Файл управления сканированием сайта роботами
?
Robots.txt указывает поисковым роботам, какие страницы сканировать, а какие — нет. Ошибки в файле могут случайно закрыть важные разделы от индексации.
Robots.txt настроен корректно. Размер файла: 41862 байт. Загружен за: 1сек.
Проверяемая страница не запрещена в robots.txt.
Robots.txt доступен по постоянному адресу
Цепочка редиректов для файла robots.txt:
http://greenhousedefect.com/robots.txt
301 MovedPermanently
https://greenhousedefect.com/index.php
200 OK
Показать содержимое robots.txt
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en-US">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<!--
This website is powered by TYPO3 - inspiring people to share!
TYPO3 is a free open source Content Management Framework initially created by Kasper Skaarhoj and licensed under GNU/GPL.
TYPO3 is copyright 1998-2026 of Kasper Skaarhoj. Extensions are copyright of their respective owners.
Information and contribution at https://typo3.org/
-->
<title>A critical approach to the actual science of climate change</title>
<meta name="generator" content="TYPO3 CMS" />
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/typo3conf/ext/news/Resources/Public/Css/news-basic.css?1619982806" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/typo3temp/assets/css/82a8d5a61d.css?1620024451" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/Css/flexslider.css?1619517776" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/Css/mods.css?1621097817" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/typo3conf/ext/mindshape_cookie_hint/Resources/Public/Css/dark-bottom.css?1620674564" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/fileadmin/template/start.css?1622302678" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/fileadmin/template/boilerplate.css?1622124491" media="all">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/fileadmin/template/bilder.css?1619514994" media="all">
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/fileadmin/template/respond.min.js?1619514152" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link rel="next" href="/?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=2&cHash=e1bb6617bf13fd00e12d2a5e59935d3d" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics -->
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-96WS4HJ9XQ"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-96WS4HJ9XQ');
</script>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://greenhousedefect.com/"/>
</head>
<body>
<div class="gridContainer clearfix">
<div id="LayoutDiv1">
<div id="header-container">
<div id="oben-links-navi">
<p> <li><a href="/contrails" target="_top">Contrails</a></li><li><a href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs" target="_top">The Holy Grail of ECS</a></li><li><a href="/basic-greenhouse-defects" target="_top">Basic Greenhouse Defects</a></li> </p>
</div>
<div id="logo"><a href="https://greenhousedefect.com/"><img src="/fileadmin/template/logo.png" alt="The Greenhouse Defect - The most disruptive site on climate science"></a></div>
<div id="topnavi">
<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/The-Greenhouse-Defect-109782271283411"><img src="/fileadmin/template/facebook.png" alt="Visit us on Facebook"></a></p>
</div>
<div id="topnavi-mobil">
<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/The-Greenhouse-Defect-109782271283411"><img src="/fileadmin/template/facebook.png" alt="Visit us on Facebook"></a></p>
<div id="logo-mobil"><a href="https://greenhousedefect.com/"><img src="/fileadmin/template/logo.png" alt="The Greenhouse Defect - The most disruptive site on climate science"></a></div>
</div>
<div id="fotoslide">
<div id="c2" class="frame frame-default frame-type-list frame-layout-0"><div class="tx-ws-flexslider"><div id="flexslider-2" class="flexslider "><ul class="slides"><li><div class="slidercontent wsflexslider-style1"><img src="/fileadmin/template/slide01-text.jpg" width="1200" height="468" alt="" /><div class="caption-wrapper caption-align-left"></div></div></li></ul></div></div></div>
<div id="maincontentcontainer">
<div id="contentleft">
<div id="c1" class="frame frame-default frame-type-textpic frame-layout-0"><header><h1 class="">
The Greenhouse Defect
</h1><h2 class="">
The most disruptive site on climate science
</h2></header><div class="ce-textpic ce-center ce-above"></div></div>
<div id="c5" class="frame frame-default frame-type-list frame-layout-0"><div class="news"><!--TYPO3SEARCH_end--><div class="news-list-view" id="news-container-5"><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Regrettable Regressions – a Reanalysis ..or how “Climate Science” has its eyes wide shut on the statistical blunder that generates false positive feedbacks" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/regrettable-regressions-a-reanalysis"><span itemprop="headline">Regrettable Regressions – a Reanalysis ..or how “Climate Science” has its eyes wide shut on the statistical blunder that generates false positive feedbacks</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Regrettable Regressions – a Reanalysis ..or how “Climate Science” has its eyes wide shut on the statistical blunder that generates false positive feedbacks" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/regrettable-regressions-a-reanalysis"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/5/9/csm_CDSpre_a27796b8c8.png" width="300" height="158" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Ok, this is something I ran into while analyzing the proxies for climate sensitivity. While connected to all the other issues, it is a species of blunders on its own right. I think it makes for a beautiful showcase of deception, compliance and stupidity, and I only just realized it. And please do not get me wrong, I do not want to finger point, or put any blame on anyone. But this one issue alone has a huge impact on the whole of climate sensitivity, and everything downstream.
</p><p>The inspiring SoD example
</p><p> </p><p>The chart below is from SoD1 and it gives the dOLR/dTs relation over 13 years. These are…</p></div><a class="more" title="Regrettable Regressions – a Reanalysis ..or how “Climate Science” has its eyes wide shut on the statistical blunder that generates false positive feedbacks" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/regrettable-regressions-a-reanalysis"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-12-12"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="How to Flip the Sign on Feedbacks " href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/how-to-flip-the-sign-on-feedbacks"><span itemprop="headline">How to Flip the Sign on Feedbacks </span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="How to Flip the Sign on Feedbacks " href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/how-to-flip-the-sign-on-feedbacks"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/7/7/csm_sign-feedback5_a257aea71f.png" width="300" height="197" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>For context I strongly recommend reading (and understanding!) those two articles first:
</p><p> </p><p>A Falsification - the incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback
</p><p> </p><p>The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative
</p><p> </p><p>As always, basic climate physics is kind of hidden away in climate models, which are pretty inaccessible to the outside world, but even the “climate experts” playing with these models might not actually know about the innards. Writing the code (in the back end) and publishing model output are two different things. Anyway, once you know about the physics the models try…</p></div><a class="more" title="How to Flip the Sign on Feedbacks " href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/how-to-flip-the-sign-on-feedbacks"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-11-20"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="CO2 Sinks and the Ocean" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-and-the-ocean"><span itemprop="headline">CO2 Sinks and the Ocean</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="CO2 Sinks and the Ocean" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-and-the-ocean"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/8/9/csm_CO2sinks.png8_317f6f9584.png" width="300" height="215" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>This was probably the very first thing I analyzed in terms of “climate science”. I downloaded the RCP pathway(s) data from the “Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research”, a couple of excel sheets basically. For the respective scenarios they had emission pathways, concentrations of the respective GHGs, and their radiative forcings. The data, last updated in 2010, are still available1.
</p><p> </p><p>Once I had the data, I did the natural thing and started analyzing them. My primary interest was on how they treated CO2 sinks. Since emissions and concentrations were in separate sheets, I evidently had…</p></div><a class="more" title="CO2 Sinks and the Ocean" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-and-the-ocean"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-11-12"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="CO2 sinks failing?" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-failing"><span itemprop="headline">CO2 sinks failing?</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="CO2 sinks failing?" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-failing"><img src="/fileadmin/user_upload/CO2sf10.png" width="273" height="221" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>As with a previous article I already pointed out there is something going on. Either, as you could read from the official data, CO2 sinks have been weakening over the last ~15years, or there is massive underreporting of our emissions. I have looked a little closer at some of the data since then, and there are some interesting finds.
</p><p> </p><p>First of all the nonsense paper Liu et al 20151, published in Nature, claimed a 0.499 effective carbon share in Chinese coal was 40% less than a 0.713 base assumption by the IPCC (defying mathematics!), so that it had overreported its emissions and thus, in all…</p></div><a class="more" title="CO2 sinks failing?" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-failing"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-11-01"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="The (true) CO2 Emissions of China " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-co2-emissions-of-china"><span itemprop="headline">The (true) CO2 Emissions of China </span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="The (true) CO2 Emissions of China " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-co2-emissions-of-china"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/7/3/csm_chinaCO2-4-2_e1d24fd1a0.png" width="300" height="170" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>In the Paris Agreement China promised to reduce its CO2 emissions, from 2030 onward, relative to 2030. From there on the emissions should shrink to net zero by the year 2060. The interesting feature about this agreement is that up to 2030 China can emit as much as it wants to. Not just that, it even puts itself in a better position by maximizing its emissions, because it will have a larger CO2 budget to work off later. There are further commitments, like planting trees, decreasing carbon intensity of the GDP, or certain shares of “renewables” in energy consumption. But none of these are much…</p></div><a class="more" title="The (true) CO2 Emissions of China " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-co2-emissions-of-china"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-07-18"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-climate-kill-switch-why-feedbacks-are-actually-negative"><span itemprop="headline">The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-climate-kill-switch-why-feedbacks-are-actually-negative"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/b/e/csm_CKS12_3080dd2b45.png" width="300" height="235" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Outrageous claims may lead to extreme insights. It is as old as epistemology itself and a highly useful tool when analyzing things, I used it many times before. If you think there is a relation, a physical law or something, think it to the ends. What would it mean in the extremes? Is it still plausible then? You always need to put your own thoughts to the test and to anyone mentally fit, this is common procedure.
</p><p> </p><p>As anyone I am not endlessly creative when it comes to generating own thoughts. That is where outside input, education in the best sense, comes in handy. Let me be straight,…</p></div><a class="more" title="The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-climate-kill-switch-why-feedbacks-are-actually-negative"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-05-21"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Water Vapor – the Simple Truth" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/water-vapor-the-simple-truth"><span itemprop="headline">Water Vapor – the Simple Truth</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Water Vapor – the Simple Truth" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/water-vapor-the-simple-truth"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/a/2/csm_simpleclouds3_5bd397973b.png" width="300" height="93" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>We are learning over time. Driving a bicycle will feel like the most natural, simplistic thing to most of us, but that was not always so. There will have been a time when it appeared an insurmountable challenge. Eventually you would manage driving it, but of course you still felt insecure and awkward. But over time everything settles and you might even learn some stunts.
</p><p> </p><p>Dealing with climate physics I had some similar experiences. Insights, even if not fundamentally new, become way more understood and obvious over time. You learn tricks, short cuts, you play around with it, and soon enough…</p></div><a class="more" title="Water Vapor – the Simple Truth" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/water-vapor-the-simple-truth"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-02-01"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="How to “hockey stick”" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/how-to-hockey-stick"><span itemprop="headline">How to “hockey stick”</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="How to “hockey stick”" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/how-to-hockey-stick"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/b/c/csm_MHS3_6d8adc0586.png" width="300" height="150" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>First of all you will need some really useless random data, and lots of them. I mean not that they were actual data, but just noise. They can easily be produced in Excel using the rand() function. I used the expression in D2 “=RAND()+C2-0.5-C2*0.01” and pulled that expression horizontally over 150 columns. What it does effectively is adding some random (-0.5 to +0.5) to every data point and containing the growth via the last term, subtracting one percent of the deviation from zero.
</p><p> </p><p>The whole procedure is meant to give some nice, noise data garbage, like in the chart below. Btw. I truncated…</p></div><a class="more" title="How to “hockey stick”" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/how-to-hockey-stick"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2025-02-01"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Methane" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/methane"><span itemprop="headline">Methane</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Methane" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/methane"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/c/a/csm_meth5_783bf44811.png" width="300" height="217" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Methane, as you all will know, is a greenhouse gas, next to being a by-product of digestion by cows, as well as our own. Remarkably that is about where the knowledge ends, as there is an awful lot of nonsense circulating on the subject, originating both from the consensus as the critical side. So let me have short and simple review on the subject that even the ordinary reader should be able to comprehend. You know, the simple things..
</p><p> </p><p>The common narrative
</p><p> </p><p>Over 20 years, the methane would trap about 80 times as much heat as the CO2. Over 100 years, that original ton of methane would trap…</p></div><a class="more" title="Methane" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/methane"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2024-07-05"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="This planet deserves a better class of climate denier" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/this-planet-deserves-a-better-class-of-climate-denier"><span itemprop="headline">This planet deserves a better class of climate denier</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="This planet deserves a better class of climate denier" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/this-planet-deserves-a-better-class-of-climate-denier"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/2/9/csm_TPD0better_298d03abd1.png" width="300" height="163" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Consensus climate science is driven by a lack of criticism. Critical climate science is driven by a lack of competence. Both sides add to the impression of a settled science, with only idiots rejecting it. It is certainly a tragic story and to illustrate it, let me present a couple of examples to show what state the “critical side” is in. The named examples are not meant to ridicule the concerning individuals, but rather to discuss the prevailing incompetence, or disinterest in physics in general.</p></div><a class="more" title="This planet deserves a better class of climate denier" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/this-planet-deserves-a-better-class-of-climate-denier"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2024-06-03"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="A Falsification - The incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-incredibly-stupid-case-of-water-vapor-feedback"><span itemprop="headline">A Falsification - The incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="A Falsification - The incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-incredibly-stupid-case-of-water-vapor-feedback"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/4/7/csm_WVF13WVdiag2_b0a7c5363e.png" width="300" height="240" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>In one of the last articles I investigated the “radiative flux” (sic!) concept. With it, although I am afraid it is based on really bad logic, it is at least possible to reproduce the canonical CO2 forcing estimate of some 3.7W/m2. However even this theoretical approach is no remedy for a (primary-) water vapor (WV) feedback of some 1.8W/m2. There is simply no way to get even close to this figure. Even if you push all the limits, you will get no higher than 1.2W/m2. I mean it will be a lot lower anyway, as WV is vastly overrated as a GHG.
</p><p> </p><p>The situation is odd enough, given radiative…</p></div><a class="more" title="A Falsification - The incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-incredibly-stupid-case-of-water-vapor-feedback"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2024-03-13"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Seeing through the Atmospheric Window" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/seeing-through-the-atmospheric-window"><span itemprop="headline">Seeing through the Atmospheric Window</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Seeing through the Atmospheric Window" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/seeing-through-the-atmospheric-window"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/8/6/csm_trenberth2011_c973a07c9c.png" width="300" height="247" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Ok, this is a little issue I ran into and I really wanted to source it out, rather than having it bloating up another article, while not properly addressing it. If you look up the literature, like the famous Kiehl, Trenberth papers, or Wikipedia, you will get a straight forward answer. The atmospheric window is about 40W/m2 in size, and of course it is all settled science.
</p><p> </p><p>In reality the settled rather means consensus, and consensus means the abolishment of all scientific principles like pluralism and criticism to promote an all too important message. Just digging a little deeper reveals,…</p></div><a class="more" title="Seeing through the Atmospheric Window" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/seeing-through-the-atmospheric-window"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2024-03-13"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="A Cross-Check to Mann’s Hockey Stick" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/a-cross-check-to-manns-hockey-stick"><span itemprop="headline">A Cross-Check to Mann’s Hockey Stick</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="A Cross-Check to Mann’s Hockey Stick" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/a-cross-check-to-manns-hockey-stick"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/d/a/csm_HS14_ef4749f3eb.png" width="300" height="173" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Sorry for being silent here for way too long. I guess I just took on a bad habit of starting articles and not finishing them. Partly this is because I like to go into depth before making a statement, partly it is because “climate science” is just a target rich environment. There are so many absurd stories worth to be told, which strangely enough were never covered. I can only emphasize again what a miserable job the “critical side” is doing. Anyway..
</p><p> </p><p>Michael Mann’s famous (or rather infamous) hockey stick has been talked about a lot. He was brave enough to “hide the decline” in tree ring…</p></div><a class="more" title="A Cross-Check to Mann’s Hockey Stick" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/a-cross-check-to-manns-hockey-stick"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2024-03-13"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Unboxing the Black Box" href="/unboxing-the-black-box"><span itemprop="headline">Unboxing the Black Box</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Unboxing the Black Box" href="/unboxing-the-black-box"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/c/f/csm_CO2_hockey_stick_fbb4ba3fc7.png" width="300" height="192" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>I have written a couple of articles investigating climate sensitivity and asserted it was almost negligible. Well, since “negligible” is a circumstantial term, let me be more precise. Based on line-by-line calculations and some necessary corrections to what are identifiable mistakes in the orthodox approach, I did end up with a figure of around 0.5K only. That would allow for CO2 forcing and WV feedback, though not for other feedbacks like cloud- and albedo-. These however, even when considered in orthodox magnitudes, would barely affect the outcome.
</p><p> </p><p>All these calculations were implicitly…</p></div><a class="more" title="Unboxing the Black Box" href="/unboxing-the-black-box"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2023-07-31"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="The Anatomy of a Climate Science Disaster " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-anatomy-of-a-climate-science-disaster"><span itemprop="headline">The Anatomy of a Climate Science Disaster </span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="The Anatomy of a Climate Science Disaster " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-anatomy-of-a-climate-science-disaster"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/7/e/csm_trenberthchart_ae39b5be7f.png" width="300" height="206" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Last year, when Gavin Schmidt explained the CO2 problem in six easy steps on the realclimate blog, I could not help to hint towards the surface emissivity problem. You know, while the consensus largely assumes an emissivity of unity, it is rather about 0.91 in reality. This blunder alone produces a chain reaction of more severe consequences, like overstating the GHE, getting the attribution wrong, overstating climate sensitivity and messing up climate models in a way that no super computer will ever fix.
</p><p> </p><p>Gavin was so kind to respond: “Not really sure why you think this, but LW emissivity…</p></div><a class="more" title="The Anatomy of a Climate Science Disaster " href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-anatomy-of-a-climate-science-disaster"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2023-04-05"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Why 2W/m2 CO2 forcing is actually quite certain" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/why-2w/m2-co2-forcing-is-actually-quite-certain"><span itemprop="headline">Why 2W/m2 CO2 forcing is actually quite certain</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Why 2W/m2 CO2 forcing is actually quite certain" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/why-2w/m2-co2-forcing-is-actually-quite-certain"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/7/e/csm_wijn4_c429a943a2.png" width="300" height="173" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>It is funny how the content of this largely ignored site sometimes diffuses into the world. Of course such education is its scope, but one might expect people to communicate a little more open on what their source is, or ask for clarification if the content is too complex for them. After all this would help to spread the word and gain me some well deserved reputation.
</p><p> </p><p>Bob Irvine’s misunderstanding
</p><p> </p><p>Just a few days ago I had a little déjà-vu while reading an article on WUWT. The title was “The Climate Feedback Debate”, sounding interesting to me. After a couple of paraphrases I could not…</p></div><a class="more" title="Why 2W/m2 CO2 forcing is actually quite certain" href="/the-holy-grail-of-ecs/why-2w/m2-co2-forcing-is-actually-quite-certain"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2023-02-06"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Aerosols in “Climate Science”" href="/contrails/aerosols-in-climate-science"><span itemprop="headline">Aerosols in “Climate Science”</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Aerosols in “Climate Science”" href="/contrails/aerosols-in-climate-science"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/7/b/csm_aerosols4_d7b216087c.png" width="300" height="182" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>Aerosols, although poorly understood, play a vital role in climate models. If you ask why global warming only really started in the 1970s, aerosols are the answer. If you wonder how the only moderate warming witnessed so far shall support high climate sensitivity, again aerosols are the answer. So it is about time we take a closer look at them.
</p><p> </p><p>Aerosols and Volcanos
</p><p> </p><p>It is true, aerosols can cool the planet. In fact declining (surface-) temperatures have been observed many times over after volcanic eruptions. In the course of an eruption, lots of hot gases, most importantly sulfur, get…</p></div><a class="more" title="Aerosols in “Climate Science”" href="/contrails/aerosols-in-climate-science"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2022-11-16"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="The mysterious Polar Amplification" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-mysterious-polar-amplification"><span itemprop="headline">The mysterious Polar Amplification</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="The mysterious Polar Amplification" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-mysterious-polar-amplification"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/a/a/csm_AA0_10c300384e.png" width="300" height="188" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>I do not know why, but „Climate Science“ seems to be cursed to get everything wrong, even if it is completely pointless. It puts me into an awkward position to sort out all these side shows, when there is a far more significant main line. Yet you can not really skip it, since sooner or later it would haunt you anyway. What can I say..
</p><p> </p><p>The Polar Amplification, what does it mean? It is pretty simple, the poles tend to heat, or cool respectively, much stronger than the rest of the planet. Something makes the climate there specifically sensitive. When we are talking about ice ages and…</p></div><a class="more" title="The mysterious Polar Amplification" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/the-mysterious-polar-amplification"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2022-10-22"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title="Contrails – the Basic Physics" href="/contrails/contrails-the-basic-physics"><span itemprop="headline">Contrails – the Basic Physics</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title="Contrails – the Basic Physics" href="/contrails/contrails-the-basic-physics"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/1/a/csm_emissionvsalt3_8813cc8da2.png" width="300" height="185" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>I know focusing on contrails as the main cause for global warming may look a bit strange to most people. Are they not reflecting sun light? Should that not be cooling the planet? And even in the scientific literature, although by now it is consensus new they have some warming momentum, this was quite disputed for a long time. However, if you understand the basic physics of the GHE correctly, and there is a lot of confusion out there, then contrails are a logical subject of interest.
</p><p> </p><p>As with any component of the atmosphere, there are two sides to be considered. That is a) the SW- and b) the…</p></div><a class="more" title="Contrails – the Basic Physics" href="/contrails/contrails-the-basic-physics"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2022-09-12"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><!--
=====================
Partials/List/Item.html
--><div class="article articletype-1" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Article"><!-- header --><div class="header"><h3><a title=" A little thing about “Back Radiation” that people forget" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/a-little-thing-about-back-radiation-that-people-forget"><span itemprop="headline"> A little thing about “Back Radiation” that people forget</span></a></h3></div><div class="news-img-wrap"><a title=" A little thing about “Back Radiation” that people forget" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/a-little-thing-about-back-radiation-that-people-forget"><img src="/fileadmin/_processed_/d/a/csm_BRchart_f828325cdc.png" width="300" height="162" alt="" /></a></div><!-- teaser --><div class="teaser-text"><div itemprop="description"><p>As we have discussed GHGs and clouds are overlapped all over the place. “Climate science” largely ignores this and the logical implications to it. Moreover however, GHGs overlap themselves so to say. It is for this reason, that a doubling of CO2 will not double its radiative forcing, but will only cause a gradual increase. Some people call this “saturation”, suggesting CO2 and other GHGs would hardly enhance the GHE with additional quantities. While this is essentially true, there is no innovation in it, as the orthodoxy claims nothing else.</p></div><a class="more" title=" A little thing about “Back Radiation” that people forget" href="/basic-greenhouse-defects/a-little-thing-about-back-radiation-that-people-forget"></a></div><!-- footer information --><div class="footer"><p><!-- date --><span class="news-list-date"><time itemprop="datePublished" datetime="2022-07-15"></time></span><!-- author --></p></div></div><div class="page-navigation"><p>
Page 1 of 3.
</p><ul class="f3-widget-paginator"><li class="current">1</li><li><a href="/?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=2&cHash=e1bb6617bf13fd00e12d2a5e59935d3d">2</a></li><li><a href="/?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=3&cHash=854d4b209f8ab5301641f76f5ed47915">3</a></li><li class="last next"><a href="/?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=2&cHash=e1bb6617bf13fd00e12d2a5e59935d3d">
Next
</a></li></ul></div><div class="news-clear"></div></div><!--TYPO3SEARCH_begin--></div></div>
</div>
<div id="contentright"><div id="buchen">
<div id="c25" class="frame frame-default frame-type-text frame-layout-0"><h3>Saving the planet is one of the harder jobs. Feel free to support ;)</h3></div>
<div id="c24" class="frame frame-default frame-type-html frame-layout-0"><form action="https://www.paypal.com/donate" method="post" target="_top"><input type="hidden" name="hosted_button_id" value="Q6YMFNCRRVXRY" /><input type="image" src="/fileadmin/template/paypal.png" border="0" name="submit" title="PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!" alt="Donate with PayPal button" /></form></div>
</div></div></div>
</div> <div id="footer"><div id="footerleft"> <li><a href="/test" target="_top">Test</a></li><li><a href="/the-reason" target="_top">The Reason</a></li><li><a href="/contact" target="_top">Contact</a></li><li><a href="/privacy-statement" target="_top">Privacy Statement</a></li></div><div id="footerright"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script>
window.cookieconsent_options = {
expiryDays: 365,
learnMore: 'More info.',
dismiss: 'Got it',
message: 'This website uses cookies for the best experience on our website.',
link: '/privacy-statement',
appendToBottom: true
};
</script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/typo3conf/ext/ws_flexslider/Resources/Public/JavaScript/jquery.flexslider-min.js?1619517776" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/typo3conf/ext/mindshape_cookie_hint/Resources/Public/Js/cookieconsent.js?1620674633" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
/*<![CDATA[*/
/*flexslider-2*/
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
jQuery('#flexslider-2').flexslider({
animation: "fade",
animationLoop: true,
itemMargin: "0",
easing: "swing",
direction: "horizontal",
reverse: false,
smoothHeight: false,
startAt: 0,
slideshow: true,
slideshowSpeed: 6000,
animationSpeed: 3000,
initDelay: 0,
randomize: false,
pauseOnAction: true,
pauseOnHover: false,
useCSS: true,
touch: true,
video: false,
controlNav: false,
directionNav: false,
prevText: "Previous",
nextText: "Next",
keyboard: true,
multipleKeyboard: false,
mousewheel: false,
pausePlay: false,
pauseText: "Pause",
playText: "Play",
controlsContainer: "",
manualControls: "",
sync: "",
asNavFor: "",
itemWidth: 0,
itemMargin: 0,
minItems: 0,
maxItems: 0,
move: 0,
carousel: false,
start: function(slider){
jQuery('body').removeClass('loading');
}
});
});
/*]]>*/
</script>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Cached page generated 21-08-26 19:25. Expires 22-08-26 19:25 -->
Sitemap
Кол-во: 0
XML-карта сайта для поисковиков
?
Sitemap.xml помогает поисковику быстрее находить и индексировать страницы. Особенно важен для крупных сайтов и новых страниц, на которые ещё нет входящих ссылок.
Robots.txt не содержит ссылку на карту сайта. Рекомендуется добавить карту сайта и указать ссылку на нее в robots.txt.
Внутренние ссылки
Кол-во: 50
Ссылки на другие страницы своего сайта
?
Внутренние ссылки распределяют ссылочный вес между страницами и помогают поисковику обходить сайт. Пустые анкоры и ссылки на запрещённые robots.txt страницы — типичные ошибки.
На странице присутствуют внутренние ссылки с пустым анкором: 20!
Внутренних ссылок на странице 50 оптимально.
Внутренние ссылки не запрещены к индексации в robots.txt.
На странице присутствуют изображения 22.
Показать внутренние ссылки
| Url | Анкор | Состояние | Анализировать |
|---|---|---|---|
| /contrails |
Contrails
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs |
The Holy Grail of ECS
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects |
Basic Greenhouse Defects
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/regrettable-regressions-a-reanalysis |
<span itemprop="headline">Regrettable Regressions – a Reanalysis ..or how “Climate Science” has its eyes wide shut on the statistical blunder that generates false positive feedbacks</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/regrettable-regressions-a-reanalysis |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/how-to-flip-the-sign-on-feedbacks |
<span itemprop="headline">How to Flip the Sign on Feedbacks </span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/how-to-flip-the-sign-on-feedbacks |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-and-the-ocean |
<span itemprop="headline">CO2 Sinks and the Ocean</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-and-the-ocean |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-failing |
<span itemprop="headline">CO2 sinks failing?</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/co2-sinks-failing |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-co2-emissions-of-china |
<span itemprop="headline">The (true) CO2 Emissions of China </span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-co2-emissions-of-china |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-climate-kill-switch-why-feedbacks-are-actually-negative |
<span itemprop="headline">The Climate Kill Switch – Why Feedbacks are Actually Negative</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-climate-kill-switch-why-feedbacks-are-actually-negative |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/water-vapor-the-simple-truth |
<span itemprop="headline">Water Vapor – the Simple Truth</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/water-vapor-the-simple-truth |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/how-to-hockey-stick |
<span itemprop="headline">How to “hockey stick”</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/how-to-hockey-stick |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/methane |
<span itemprop="headline">Methane</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/methane |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/this-planet-deserves-a-better-class-of-climate-denier |
<span itemprop="headline">This planet deserves a better class of climate denier</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/this-planet-deserves-a-better-class-of-climate-denier |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-incredibly-stupid-case-of-water-vapor-feedback |
<span itemprop="headline">A Falsification - The incredibly stupid case of water vapor feedback</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/the-incredibly-stupid-case-of-water-vapor-feedback |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/seeing-through-the-atmospheric-window |
<span itemprop="headline">Seeing through the Atmospheric Window</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/seeing-through-the-atmospheric-window |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/a-cross-check-to-manns-hockey-stick |
<span itemprop="headline">A Cross-Check to Mann’s Hockey Stick</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/a-cross-check-to-manns-hockey-stick |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /unboxing-the-black-box |
<span itemprop="headline">Unboxing the Black Box</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /unboxing-the-black-box |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-anatomy-of-a-climate-science-disaster |
<span itemprop="headline">The Anatomy of a Climate Science Disaster </span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-anatomy-of-a-climate-science-disaster |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/why-2w/m2-co2-forcing-is-actually-quite-certain |
<span itemprop="headline">Why 2W/m2 CO2 forcing is actually quite certain</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-holy-grail-of-ecs/why-2w/m2-co2-forcing-is-actually-quite-certain |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /contrails/aerosols-in-climate-science |
<span itemprop="headline">Aerosols in “Climate Science”</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /contrails/aerosols-in-climate-science |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-mysterious-polar-amplification |
<span itemprop="headline">The mysterious Polar Amplification</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/the-mysterious-polar-amplification |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /contrails/contrails-the-basic-physics |
<span itemprop="headline">Contrails – the Basic Physics</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /contrails/contrails-the-basic-physics |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/a-little-thing-about-back-radiation-that-people-forget |
<span itemprop="headline"> A little thing about “Back Radiation” that people forget</span>
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /basic-greenhouse-defects/a-little-thing-about-back-radiation-that-people-forget |
Пустой анкор
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=2&cHash=e1bb6617bf13fd00e12d2a5e59935d3d |
2
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=3&cHash=854d4b209f8ab5301641f76f5ed47915 |
3
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /?tx_news_pi1%5B%40widget_0%5D%5BcurrentPage%5D=2&cHash=e1bb6617bf13fd00e12d2a5e59935d3d |
Next
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /test |
Test
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /the-reason |
The Reason
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /contact |
Contact
|
|
Анализировать url |
| /privacy-statement |
Privacy Statement
|
|
Анализировать url |
Внешние ссылки
Не найдено
Ссылки на сторонние сайты
?
Исходящие внешние ссылки передают часть ссылочного веса на чужие сайты. Ссылки на авторитетные ресурсы безопасны; ссылки на мусорные сайты могут навредить репутации страницы.
Внешних ссылок на странице не найдено.
Конкуренты Готовность: 0%
Конкуренты в Яндексе
Кол-во: 0
Топ сайтов-конкурентов в Яндексе
?
Сайты, чаще всего появляющиеся в ТОПе Яндекса по запросам из семантического ядра этой страницы.
Мы не нашли у вас конкурентов в Яндексе. Сайт или очень молодой или плохо продвигается.
Конкурентов в ТОП-10 Яндекса не нашлось.
Конкуренты в Google
Кол-во: 0
Топ сайтов-конкурентов в Google
?
Сайты, чаще всего появляющиеся в ТОПе Google по запросам из семантического ядра этой страницы.
Конкуренты в Google тоже не найдены. Займитесь продвижением сайта!
Конкурентов в ТОП-10 Google не нашлось.
ЗоЗПП: права потребителей Готовность: 100%
Нарушения
Не выявлены
Признаков дистанционной продажи товаров (интернет-магазина) не обнаружено — требования ЗоЗПП о раскрытии информации продавца к сайту не применяются. Нарушений нет.
ФЗ-149: рекомендательные технологии Готовность: 100%
Нарушения
Не выявлены
Рекомендательные блоки («с этим покупают», «похожие товары» и т.п.) на сайте не обнаружены — требования ст. 10.7 ФЗ-149 к сайту не применяются. Нарушений нет.
ФЗ-38: реклама Готовность: 100%
Нарушения
Не выявлены
Рекламных тематик с обязательными оговорками (медицина, БАД, кредиты и займы, новостройки) на сайте не обнаружено. Нарушений нет.
ФЗ-436: защита детей Готовность: 100%
Нарушения
Не выявлены
Признаков информационной продукции (новости, видео, книги, игры, курсы) не обнаружено — обязательная возрастная маркировка по ФЗ-436 сайту не требуется. Нарушений нет.
Вердикт
Таким сайт greenhousedefect.com видят поисковые системы. Процент оптимизации невысокий - 68%. Чтобы улучшить сайт и попасть в ТОП необходимо:
Исправьте ошибки в мета-тегах.
Поделитесь с друзьями: